. After two years and 238 deaths at the hands of Islamic terrorism, what did France do to defeat radical Islam? Almost nothing. If Emmanuel Macron wins, France as we have known it can be considered pretty much over. By blaming 'colonialism' for French troubles in the Arab world, and calling it 'a crime against humanity', he has effectively legitimized Muslim extremist violence against the French Republic.
Jonn2 さん ([email protected]) 2012年 10月 26日 03時 31分 29秒 URL:http://franklinntsdz.magix.net/public/apple-iphone-3g-s.
In just two years, Muslim organizations in France have dragged to trial great writers such as Georges Bensoussan, Pascal Bruckner, and Renaud Camus. It is the Islamists' dream coming true: seeing 'Islamophobes' on trial to restrict their freedom of expression. Charlie Hebdo's physical massacre was therefore followed by an intellectual one. I'm praying that France manages to elect Marine Le Pen so that France can begin to take back its country. I know a lot of people write the French off as hopeless cowards, but they were able to wrest their country from English control with the help of Joan of Arc. If France can remember and embrace that part of its past, they can take back their country.
France is our oldest ally and they gave us brave men such as Lafayette, Rochambeau, De Kalb, and De Grasse, without whom we might have remained an English colony. France has given the world beautiful, irreplaceable artwork and gifted writers such as Voltaire and Beaumarchais. It would be beyond tragic for Lafayette's homeland to destroy itself through appeasement to islam. On a side note, I've read 'Submission' and I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to get an idea of how the takeover would play out.
Unfortunately, IT IS TOO LATE!!! Blaming 'colonialism' was the most stupid mistake the French people and many other Europeans made. I am not trying to Justify colonialism, but events were a lot more peaceful, once upon a time. Yes, colonialism was wrong, but that does not exuse commiting suicide by the Europeans, or feeling guilty the rest of their life.
![]()
Of course, neither the French nor any other Europeans ever feel guilty for killing or getting rid of Jews - that is always 'kosher'. In any case, it is too late. The Muslims are here to stay, and GOD help those who do not convert to Islam. As for free speech - that is another 'luxury' of the past - most Muslims do not beleive in it. Thank you Giulio Meotti and Gatestone. The French people are a gutless bunch, and have been certainly since the run-up to WWII.
They didn't fight then, they didn't fight Communism during the Cold War and they have not fought Radical Terrorism since it began to rear its ugly head back in the 1980's. Lack of courage this extreme began evolving in France beginning with its bloody and ill conceived French Revolution. Since then and in comparison with the US and Britain, they are a people who have turned their backs on God, as they have embraced all the soft slimy tentacles of Secular Humanism. Unfortunately, France is just the least effective partner of the US in this 'Longest War', as all of Western Europe seems to have also fallen into the clutches of Secular Humanism.
Only Eastern Europe, fresh from its memories of godless Communism's similarly slimy tentacles, has so far shown a spine in this war. The moral of this story playing out now for the umpteenth time in recorded history is that. 'A people who can find no greater purpose in life than their own selfish pleasures, and who deny the God who created them.
Will have those pleasures purloined as they slowly and painfully rot in the Hell of their own making!' Not that the US has to this point proven ourselves so much better! The same modernist and post Christian beliefs have blinded most of our leadership and many of our people.
Can we improve on our sorry performance in this 'Longest War' and save ourselves from what looks to be an almost certain sorry plight for the French? Stay tuned and get (and stay!) involved! Thank you for this article and for caring about the innocent people who were slaughtered by islamist.
Franckly, my beloved country is just the shadow of what it was once. No freedom of speech, islamism everywhere, daily attacks not reported, prevention of any form of criticism against islam as if it was a race etc etc.Rights of children and women going backwards and much more that makes me think that no matter who wins the election, our country is ruined and is not safe at all. I recommend all people wanted to come as tourists to think twice as we are in red as far as the islamic terrorism just as algeria, tunisia, belgium and england! I lived for a couple of years in France as a child, making friends with French kids and gypsies in a small village between Rambouillet and Chartres.
Since then I have been part-French, part-American.so you could say that French culture made an impact on me. The France I remember and love has thousands of particular traits and traditions which are treasured, and for good reason. The distinctive French music and painting, architecture and literature, cinema and sports, appeal to me and to millions of francophiles the world over. And as for French food and wine and cognac and all things digestible - it is, my taste buds tell me, without parallel. The language is sexy and sensual and precise and lyrical, subtle and pungent at the same time, a feast for the ears and eyes, the heart and mind.
About ten years ago I spent a couple of weeks traveling in France, from north to south, and what I discovered on that visit was uplifting and dispiriting alike. The uplifting was in meeting French people and experiencing French culture as full vibrant as I recalled from my childhood, over five decades earlier. The dispiriting crept in as I recognized the tell-tale signs of an encroaching reverse colonialism, whereby the former colonials were now colonizing their former conqueror. As a native of the border basque country in the south of France told me, it is not the sub-saharan Africans or Asians who have emigrated to France who are imposing their culture on the French.it is the Muslims.
It is as if they were intentionally wrecking vengeance upon those who once dared to shame Islam and bring the ummah to heal. Whether intentional or not, and it is incontrovertible that only a fraction of Muslims are actually going about this in a self-conscious manner, it is happening. France is losing its Frenchness because it is being diluted by the introduction of other competing cultures. And in no small part this is happening because the French have a streak of self-deprecation, a fascination with suicide, a cynicism about everything they have ever valued, and this animus, this alter ego is like a cancer that destroys the French from within. We are not seeing this for the first time now, in response to Muslim colonialism.
Another example is to be found in the mischaracterization of the Vichy government and generally of those French who capitulated to and followed the orders of the invading Nazis. They are said to have been ultra-nationalists.they were nothing of the kind. The real patriots, the true champions of France during that era were the resistance, and they flourished in every walk of life, in millions of invisible acts of opposition and of love. The collaborators with Islamic colonialism in France, the members of government and of the press and of intellectual organizations that are so often reported as speaking for France, these are not patriots.they are dying of the cancer of self-hate and trying to infect the whole of France and the world with their disease. French voters have a slim chance of turning this around, of recovering their culture and making their nation glorious once again.let us hope that they vote and vote for patriots instead of traitors. Unfortunately, governments all over the world are being subjected, like it or not, to the will of the Global Elitists at the very top of the heap.
Read Agenda 21, and the plan they have begins to reveal itself. The want a homogenised planet in every way; ethnicity, rule of law, religious, governmental financial, military, and every other way. The aim, has always been global domination by a few dictators who believe that they have some right to manipulate history. No government has the real power to oppose this without an unholy backlash from these people and their fellow 'World changers'.
If this is not halted very soon, these dictators will get their way. Complete and utter capitulation is the future for France if the coward Emmanuel Macron wins the election. Why haven't those in power noticed that Muslims murder any who stand against their ideology?
Is it so difficult for them to understand what is going on, or are they so damned thick that it passes them by without them taking a glance? Have they asked themselves what other religion uses the threat of death and violence to further their cause of complete domination? How often do we see Christians or other denominations taking over streets and parks to pray? All designed to force the building of yet another monstrosity referred to as a Mosque. All we are seeing is people being killed and maimed in France and other major European cities by 'Jihadists' apparently murdering in the name of ISIS, but the real intention is to create an atmosphere of fear within the citizens so that they capitulate further and let the Muslims gain further power. Instead, the governments of these countries should be rounding Muslims up, giving them the choice of being patriotic citizens to the country they are in or leave for a Muslim country of their choice. They should not be dictating how the citizens lead their lives, and who or what they worship.
It is the government's duty to protect the people and by allowing Muslims to determined our way of life they are failing in that duty. I wish I could say that it is only France that has taken this approach but unfortunately, it's happening all across Europe with the exception of a couple of countries who have strong leadership and will not tremble or cave in, to Muslims! It's heartbreaking for many Europeans to see the state their country is getting into, but then there are some who mistakenly still consider Muslims no threat. They will find to their cost that to have welcomed Muslims into their country was the biggest mistake of all, and they will have themselves to blame and not their politicians!
I hope the French choose wisely and don't allow Macron to destroy their country totally. Vote Marine Le Pen! Look to the future of France!
Margaret Sanger, 'What Every Girl Should Know: Sexual Impulses-Part II,' 29 Dec1912. Published article. Source:, Dec. 29, 1912, C16:0046. This is the seventh article in an 12-part series.
For 'Introduction,' see, for 'Girlhood-Part I' see, for 'Girlhood-Part II' see, for 'Puberty-Part I' see, for 'Puberty-Part II' see, for 'Sexual Impulse-Part I' see for 'Reproduction-Part I' see, for 'Reproduction-Part II' see, for 'Some Consequences of Ignorance and Silence-Part I' see, for 'Some Consequences of Ignorance and Silence-Part II' see, and for 'Some Consequences of Ignorance and Silence-Part III' see WHAT EVERY GIRL SHOULD KNOW By MARGARET H. Sexual Impulses-Part II.
In the first part of this article we learned that the sexual impulse is a combination of the two impulses, the one which impels the discharge of ripe sex cells, strongest in the boy, and the other which impels the individual to touch or caress an individual of the opposite sex, strongest in the girl. Every girl has in mind an ideal man. This ideal begins to form sometime in the early adolescent age. He is usually distinct in her mind as to his physical qualities, such as dark or light hair, or brown or blue eyes. He is always a certain physical type, and often remains an ideal to her through life. At the forming period of the type she will be attracted toward many men who seem to answer the ideal type, but as she reads and develops through the various stages of the adolescent period, the ideal changes and grows with her.
As she reaches the romantic stage the ideal must be brave, daring, courteous. If she is inclined toward out-door sports he must be athletic. And so it goes on until the twenty-third year, when the average girl has a fairly settled idea of the man who would suit her as a mate through life. When the sexual impulse makes itself felt strongly in the adolescent boy or girl, they, feeling satisfied with the physical beauty and perfection of the other, marry, they are unconscious that the incentive to love when based on physical attraction alone is soon destroyed.
For sickness, poverty or disease will affect even the most seemingly perfect physical attraction. Let us not confuse the sexual impulse with love, for it alone is not love, but merely a necessary quality for the growth of love. No sexual attraction or impulse is the foundation of the beautiful emotion of love. Upon this is built respect, self-control, sympathy, unity of purpose, many common tastes and desires, building up and up until this real love unites two individuals as one being, one life.
Then it becomes the strongest and purest emotion of which the human soul is capable. There is no doubt that the natural aim of the sexual impulse is the sexual act, yet when the impulse is strongest and followed by the sexual act without love or any of the relative instincts which go to make up love, the relations are invariably followed by a feeling of disgust.
Respect for each other and for one's self is a primary essential to this intimate relation. In plant and animal life the reproductive cell of the male is the active seeker of the passive female cell, imbued with the instinct to chase and bodily capture the female cell for the purpose of reproduction. This instinct man, as he is today, has inherited, and, as with the lower forms of life, the senses are intensely involved. It is kept alive by the sense of sight, sound and smell, and reaches its highest development through the sense of touch.
It is heightened by touching smooth and soft surfaces-which is said to account for the pleasure of kissing. In the early part of this article I spoke of the desire to touch being stronger in girls than in boys. This desire leads a girl to kiss and fondle a man without any conscious desire for the sexual act; whereas in the man, to be touched and caressed by the girl for whom he has a sexual attraction, stimulates the accumulation of sex cells, and the desire for the sexual act becomes paramount in his mind. Many a young girl bubbling over with the joy of living, innocent of any serious consequences, is oft-times misjudged by men on account of these natural actions. But she soon puts on her armor of defense, and stifles and represses any outbursts of affection.
Society, too, condemns the natural expression of Woman's emotion, save under certain prescribed conditions. In consequence of this, women suppress their maternal desires and today direct this great force into other channels, participating in the bigger and broader movements and activities in which they are active today. This is one reason why the type of the so-called 'old maid,' so characteristic of the generation past, has disappeared. These great maternal powers are being used up in the activities of modern life. Instead of allowing it to remain dormant and make her odd and whimsical, the modern Woman turns her sexual impulse into a big directing force. That the male creature is the pursuer of the female in all forms of life, there is no question, but that the female has the choice of selection and uses fine discrimination in her choice, cannot be denied either.
This instinct of selection seems to lie dormant in women of today, for at puberty nature calls to every girl to make a selection suitable to her nature. Yet few girls follow this instinct on account of the specter of economic insecurity which looms up before them. Instead of asking themselves: 'Are we matable and sympathetic?' They ask: 'Shall we have enough food, clothing and shelter?' Indeed, girls, this system increases our degradation, and places us in ideals lower than the animals.
All over the civilized world today girls are being given and taken in marriage with but one purpose in view; to be well-supported by the man who takes her. She does not concern herself with the man's physical condition: his hereditary taints, the cleanliness of his mind or past life, nor with the future race. There will no doubt be a great change in Woman's attitude on this subject in the next few years. When women gain their economic freedom they will cease being playthings and utilities for men, but will assert themselves and choose the father of their offspring. As Bernard Shaw tells of her in one of his greatest plays, she will hunt down her ideal in order to produce the Superman.
There seems to be a general tendency on the part of the Woman who is demanding political freedom, to demand sexual freedom also. When a girl reaches the age nearing thirty her natural development tends toward sexual freedom. It seems as though nature, knowing the time of reproduction is drawing to a close, calls with all the fury of her strength to complete its development and procreate. It is at this age where physicians claim a Woman awakens to the sexual desire, and it is at this age that women seek affection, or gratification with a 'lover.' To her there is nothing to say; she is mature, developed and can judge for herself where best her happiness lies.
But to the young girl at the age of say twenty, or even younger, immature, mentally undeveloped, there is something she should know, and that is that every physical impulse, every sensual feeling, every lustful desire will come to her whitewashed with the sacred word LOVE. Neither the boy nor the girl knows the difference between the sexual impulse and love. A boys meets a girl, he feels a great attraction for her, he feels the sexual impulse throbbing within him, he is full of this life giving current he feels it throughout his being, he walks lighter and straighter, he feels it in his voice, in his laughter, he grows tenderer within himself, and to women.
He feels all this and is sure it is a love that will never die. If there is an attraction on the girl's part there is no difficulty in persuading her that this feeling IS love. But it is not love; it is the creative force of sexual impulse scattered through his being and the sexual act brings it to its climax. If motherhood comes to the girl through this relation, she has developed and the experience has enriched her life.
But today the girl has an idea she has escaped the greatest disgrace when she has avoided motherhood. If the relation was based on physical attraction, a few abortions and the monotony of every day life soon remove this, and the man goes elsewhere in search of this wonderful sensation which he felt at first, but did not know how to keep or how to use.
The girl, however, has become a new being, sexually awakened and conscious of it. But ignorant of the use of the forces she possesses, she plunges forth blindly, with social and economic forces against her, and prostitution beckoning at every turn. So she soon passes with the crowd on the road to the Easiest Way. This is the story of thousands of young girls living in prostitution. Women should know that the creative instinct does not need to be expended entirely on the propagation of the race. Though the sex cells are placed in a part of the anatomy for the essential purpose of easily expelling them into the female for the purpose of reproduction there are other elements in the sexual fluid which are the essence of blood, nerve, brain and muscle. When redirected into the building and strengthening of these we find men or women of the greatest endurance and greatest magnetic power.
A girl can waste her creative powers by brooding over a love affair to the extent of exhausting her system, with results not unlike the effects of masturbation and debauchery. Of course the sexual impulse is natural. It is natural in animals, degenerates, and in normal man.
But in man it is mixed with other essentials which, together, are termed love. These essentials are derived from man's power of reasoning by which he is known as a higher species and through which he differs from the animals.
When man emerged from the jungle and stood upright on his hind legs, the shape of his head and his face changed from the long jaw and flat head of the animal to the flat face and high head of the man. All progress from that time forward was made along mental lines. According to the universal law then in existence he should have been limited to a geographical area and killed by the extreme heat or cold or starved for one kind of food if it were not obtained, but against all these he fought, because he became endowed with such attributes as reason, knowledge and will-power. Instead of using his creative powers solely in hunting food and reproducing his species, he used this force in making plans for his self-preservation.
He built rafts and boats to cross rivers and streams, he devised methods of clothing himself against extreme heat and cold and discovered various ways of preparing food for different climates suitable for his various needs. In other words he conserved his creative force and redirected it into channels which have resulted in giving him precedence over all other living creatures. For man has developed a CONSCIOUS MIND which asserts itself by reasoning, which in turn has developed his brain-power. It is said a fish as large as a man has a brain no larger than the kernel of an almond.
In all fish and reptiles where there is no great brain development, there is also no conscious sexual control. The lower down in the scale of human development we go the less sexual control we find. It is said that the aboriginal Australian, the lowest known species of the human family, just a step higher than the chimpanzee in brain development, has so little sexual control that police authority alone prevents him from obtaining sexual satisfaction on the streets. According to one writer, the rapist has just enough brain development to raise him above the animal, but like the animal, when in heat knows no law except nature which impels him to procreate whatever the result. Every normal man and Woman has the power to control and direct his sexual impulse. Men and women who have it in control and constantly use their brain cells in thinking deeply, are never sensual.
It is well to understand that the natural aim of the sexual impulse is the sexual act and the natural aim of the sexual act is reproduction, though it does not always result in this. It is possible for conception to take place without love, it is even possible that there is no conscious knowledge to procreate before or during the act, yet this does not disprove the fact that nature has designed it for the purpose of reproduction, no matter what uses man has put it to today. This subject of procreation we shall discuss next.
Every girl should know that to hold in check the sexual impulse; to absorb this power into the system until there is a freely conscious sympathy, a confidence and respect between her and her ideal; that this will go toward building up the sexual impulse and will make the purest, strongest and most sacred passion of adult life, compared to which all other passions pale into insignificance. (To Be Continued.) Subject Terms:.
Copyright 2003. Margaret Sanger Project.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |